PRESS CONTACT FORM
Images for use for international press from HumanCar® Inc.
How many bicycles were used to make the FM-4?
No Bicycle parts are used in the FM-4.
Where are the pedals?
The TWASTA Patent (Team Work and Strength Training Apparatus) defines a mobile – or stationery – full body work out device, for multiple participants. There are no pedals.
How does it handle?
BodySteer utilizes more degrees of freedom than leaning – like riding a motorcycle. High speed handling is critical to the safe performance of any vehicle. Why make a 200 MPH chassis/suspension system? Why not? BodySteer is at least as effective as wheel steering – some would say much more effective.
Then why have both front occupants steer?
Part of the fun of teamwork is to share tasks. Think of it as Pilot and Co-Pilot. Either can control the vehicle, but there is an exotic sensory input when you feel the others sharing the activity. Dominant/Submissive arrangements work, and so does real-time cooperation.
Do you need a full team?
Three people works quite well. Of course, with one or two people you are probably going to want auxiliary power.
Can you tell who is slacking and who is jacking?
Why does the FM-4 prototype not have a motor on it?
If your team is in great shape and has (or desires) full body strength, or if you enjoy down hill sports of any kind, you may want to go as fast as you can. Powered vehicles fall into the USDOT Low Speed Vehicle specification with its 25 mph maximum speed. For most people, this is fast enough, and indeed, since your team will essentially reach the same speed on the FM-4 as your average cruising speed on bicycles, you probably will want some more power. Either way, it’s loads of fun.
Why did you make this unusual vehicle?
The FM-4 started life as a way of showing that many short trips simply don’t require 4,000 pound cars and everything that comes with that. Implementing the Synchronous Guideway (powered track) concept would allow human power to handle many tasks, and with auxiliary power nearly all commutes could be accomplished. In the synchronous mode, all vehicles travel at one designated speed, creating lane efficiencies far greater than the “creep and crash” method we have accepted as our transportation system. We invite all comers to fit your designs to a standardized interface specification. This could turn out to be a lot of fun.
What about bicycles?
Reynolds gave us one of the greatest invention of all time. But if you need to carry a thousand pounds, or maybe you want to have a lot of fun with you friends, then you can do that with the FM-4. A lot of people don’t get the full body workout they are looking for on a bicycle, so there’s that too. But we still ride ours regularly.
How is it going to work with Bike Lanes?
The FM-4 isn’t going to work everywhere. That’s certainly true. Fortunately, the USDOT LSV rules are creating the need for “golf cart” friendly lanes, and some forward thinking planners are providing wider “bike” lanes to enable this inevitable shift away from cars, cars and more cars.
What about cars?
Everybody should build their own. We do. That can be a lot of fun too. Seriously, our goal is to coexist with the radically different small cars that will soon take over our streets.
What about SUV’s?
If you are driving up to the slopes, use one. Of course that means that you must enjoy power assisted gravity sports. We do to. However, the SUV is anachronistic in today’s high density urban traffic mix.
What about safety?
The TWASTA patent includes the perimeter defensive shield. This is a major advantage over bicycles. High speed testing verifies the ability to maneuver your way out of danger. The FM-4 has had thousands of people on it, and no injuries. Like any device, safety is up to the operator 99.9% of the time.
Why can’t I just go out and buy one right now?
We’ve all seen the results of inadequate alpha (and beta) testing. We have held back availability until years of on-going testing has verified each and every feature of this new and different technology. The original $250,000 “geometry prototype” has made its presence felt around the world, but the production prototypes (not yet shown to the public) are several generations beyond that. The time is drawing near when all of the elements – manufacturing, marketing, and product optimization – come together in a cost effective and aesthetically pleasing form.
Why does this take so long?
Perception is gradual. When the first prototype in this series hit the road, gas cost 32.9 cents per gallon. You can imagine that large corporations are scared to death of radical change, even though it involves enormous opportunity. Ironically, it is the shift in world reality that now makes thirty plus years of development timely.
We’re hot rod builders, dirt bike riders, bicycling enthusiasts, and we love all kind of sports, with or without machines, with or without electronics. We love healthy people. You and your family will power yourselves down to the store and back. Then watch for some real exciting radical hardware.
Information and interview with HumanCar® designers and founders.
Questions and Answers w/ Charles Greenwood P.E. Chief Scientist/Inventor of HumanCar® Inc & Chuck Greenwood CEO of HC Inc. (Thank you Seema Sangra & Society and Environment Magazine)
1. How did you conceive the idea of a human-powered car?
It was 1968. Traffic was at a complete standstill, again, on a busy boulevard in what is now known as the Silicon Valley. Sitting within their cars were many commuters who were overweight and out of shape, breathing unhealthy exhaust fumes. As a young engineer working at my first job at a research and development laboratory for a major corporation, it seemed intuitively that there must be a better way to move people around than this.
Could one create a modest modification that would allow automobiles to interface with a tracked system capable of eliminating the need for drivers or vehicle power for part of the daily commute? It was this inspiration that eventually lead to the HumanCar project.
If a “Synchronous Guideway”™ could power and control a car during each leg of the commute, then the vehicle power and weight could be reduced dramatically – so much so that it might be practical to use a mix of human and electric power to propel the vehicle where no guideway was available. Thus, even without a guideway, the practical use of augmented human power might provide a matrix of benefits including health enhancement, teamwork building skills, and improved traffic flow.
Engineering studies have verified that the lane density (measured by occupants per hour per lane) with an operating Synchronous Guideway is up to ten times greater than that of an equivalent standard-design traffic lane. Similarly, HumanCar, Inc., has verified the practical design for a human/electric hybrid vehicle that provides the benefits listed above, for use with, or without, the availability of an operating Synchronous Guideway.
2. How did the Human Car actually evolved from the first model to the present one?
Creative research engineers were expected to suggest projects that might possibly lead to product development at the above mentioned facility. The search for a useful human power interface for vehicle use began with several test devices that could measure the force available from various muscle groups. It was clear that a bicycle type mechanism, while quite successful as a thigh and calf interface, would not meet the needs of a full-body work out, so early design focused upon a rowing-like motion. The first simple three-wheeled prototype traveled around the area in 1972, and design work began on the remaining components of the entire Guideway concept.
However, this product did not match the goals of the large corporation, so the design and engineering work moved to a rural location in Southern Oregon, USA, in 1975. It would take the next ten years to put together a suitable manufacturing capability and a high-tech consulting engineering business to leverage the required skills and machinery to produce serious prototype vehicles.
The 189 MPH (300 KPH) Retro Rod was the next major vehicle design, as it could rapidly test the limits of the suspension and handling theories developed for the HumanCar project itself. It was and is very successful, turning 1/4 mile drag racing elapsed times in the low ten-second range.
Finally, the FM-4 (Fully Manual – 4 people) was ready to build and test. It represented the culmination of the human power interface design coupled with an ultra-performance envelope chassis design. The FM-4, never intended to be more than a research “skeleton” car, has achieved remarkable acceptance around the world as the first practical four wheel four/passenger full body muscle car.
Finally, in 2000, the engineering and design work on the complete human electric hybrid vehicle began. The Imagine_PS (Power Station) incorporates the essence of the FM-4 while adding the features anticipated at the beginning of the HumanCar project.
3. What are the typical features of the Human Car?
We are changing the notion of what features should be considered important. Specifically, the HumanCar® Imagine_PS Low Mass Vehicle (LMV) introduces a new entrant into the transportation equation.
As an exercise-enabled vehicle, it is possible for one, two, three or four people to operate the bi-directional human-power interface. Alternatively, a single operator may operate the vehicle in electric power mode only – or any combination of human and electric power may be employed.
The Imagine_PS may operate as a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, as an exercise based human electric power station, or in vehicle-to-grid (V2G) mode. Regenerative braking and an advanced power system enhance overall efficiency. Other available features include a human/machine interface (HMI) touch-screen display with GPS and biometric data logging, iPod® integrated sound systems, and Bluetooth® compatible onboard computing/communications devices. The vehicle is especially suited to generate the power required to operate these devices. An all-weather roof shell is available.
This vehicle is 100% sustainable and non-conventional; it reformats our perception of what a vehicle can do for us, and it makes us very healthy at the same time. Thus, a new feature is born: one of social responsibility.
4. Do you think the Human Car would ever become a commercial success story?
Yes. Commercial scale production requires manufacturing partnerships worldwide, with distribution channels via existing up-market automobile networks. We are self-funded, own our facility and over 100 pre-orders exist for the Imagine_PS. We are essentially profitable right now.
Our scalable manufacturing facility is ready to be cloned worldwide for an immediate supply of units. Our 200-year business plan focuses on the production of geographically appropriate models and guideway systems. The fact that we have gained the respect of engineering professionals world-wide through our introduction of a new market definition (LMV), and the recognition we have earned at WIRED’s NextFest 2008 in Chicago USA is already a measure of our commercial success.
We have achieved brand recognition with our target consumer base on every corner of the earth at a small fraction of the research and development budgets of typical auto makers. Profitability in the new economic reality will require this kind of focus and agility with resources.
HumanCar recognizes that alternative commodities such as health, family unity, environmental responsibility and economic independence will emerge as more important criteria for measuring success.
The HumanCar FM4 “TroubleMaker” © John Carnett
5. Why would people buy your car that fails to address significant customer concerns such as safety, speed, maneuvering etc.?
People would not buy a car that fails to address safety, speed and maneuverability. Some people do purchase vehicles that do not incorporate style, efficiency and usefulness. But why not offer all of those elements and more?
The patented Body SteeringTM outperforms the typical steering wheel system that is really just a remnant of sailing ship technology. This advance must be experienced to be fully appreciated. Operator control of high-speed motorcycles and high-performance jet aircraft does not, for example, utilize steering wheels.
Safety is provided by a patented sophisticated and robust structural system that compares favorably to other alternative transportation concepts such as motorcycles, bicycles, micro cars, golf carts, and the many derivative designs similar to these vehicles. Controlled energy absorption areas integrated into the body shell offer additional protection.
No one is exempt from the laws of physics, so there is always an inherent risk when combining vehicles of very different mass and kinetic energy characteristics on the same road. These facts serve to emphasize the need for an ultimate specification requirement: open standards for a Synchronous Guideway platform, where impact risk is effectively eliminated.
6. Is the Human Car suitable for use by the elderly and disabled persons?
Some of the first visitors to come and visit the lab and get a first-hand look at the FM-4 in operation were a group of elderly persons from a care facility some distance away. A number of people over sixty (one in their eighties) tried the FM-4 and loved the way it allowed them to get a light workout and perhaps most importantly to stretch their muscles while engaging in social interaction. The FM-4 never fails to excite its occupants with a feeling of teamwork and social bonding. It is patented as a teamwork and strength-training apparatus.
Several paraplegics have contributed ideas to making the interface suitable for their needs. Individual adaptations are necessary, as there are many variations in abilities amongst the physically challenged. Universal access is a goal of HumanCar, Inc.7. What changes are you contemplating for the future versions of the Human Car?
The public is very adept and sending us feedback about what they would like, for example, the ability to convert the rear seats to a cargo area, and the integration of child-seating is desirable to many.
An important concept of the HumanCar is the chassis itself, which is designed to adapt with evolving technology. As batteries, controls and motors gain efficiency, they may be simply upgraded rather than replacing the entire vehicle. We can use many different power systems and that is a real beauty of the design – it’s universal.
Integration of sophisticated proximity braking systems, and multi-stage airbags are going to be a reality for production units in the near future. The introduction of gasbag technology into the structural body itself is being considered as well. Versions that employ more traditional operator inputs are also in development.
The FM4 has operated with thousands of people over many years and we have yet to change any of its geometry or dynamics; the engineering fundamentals are sound. The Imagine_PS™ is equally robust, and future versions will have ever-advancing power systems. The Imagine_PS™ may be operated with any power source. It is an automobile platform that adapts to changing technology, just as advanced computers are upgradeable through software and hardware swaps: the key is “plug and play”.
8. Will it be possible to drive the Human Car on highways in future?
Yes. Higher performance versions under development will be able to travel on the highway. Availability of this design will be market-driven in each country.
We believe that highways of the future will have integrated systems to monitor safety and power and will be built around common standards, such as the 1.2m track width interface for which HumanCar products are currently designed.
9. What are your plans to popularize the Human Car?
Our specific plan is to launch the new Imagine_PS with international press coverage showing the vehicle driving up to a stage where several socially conscious bands are ready to play music. This entire set is powered by the onboard power system from the Imagine_PS™. The visual information density of this performance is multi-lingual and beautifully powerful at the same time.
We have been fortunate to have an international grassroots appeal through word of mouth association between communities, demonstrating that the populist appeal is worldwide. With communications opportunities like You-Tube, it takes about one week to communicate new ideas with millions of people. Entirely new concepts like the Imagine_PS, and the FM-4, are able to take advantage of this new and exciting opportunity – one that has never happened before.
The world is entering an era of connection where traditional borders are left behind. The people that are interested in HumanCar feel the same need for practical solutions in the form of cars that require fewer resources. We all need smarter cars. HumanCar is popular in many parts of the world because it represents a clean technology that is visually immediate when seeing the vehicle in operation.
10. Do you have any plans to promote the Human Car in developing countries?
Yes. We are converting to an icon and video-based communications format for our web site, as much of the traffic originates world-wide. As in the answer to Question 9 above, visual demonstration of its multifunctional capabilities will provide real and tangible promotion during public events. Promotion is always secondary to delivering actual results. This is especially true in developing countries where there are no excess funds to be wasted on unnecessary frills.
For example, in places like Africa, we have under development a two-person mobile power station that will fold into a suitcase and may be used to generate electricity and pump and purify water. Site-specific promotion can take advantage of this kind of unique HumanCar product.
South Korea, India, and Latin America are some of the many places that fall into developing country status. Our colleagues in Seoul tell us that ten years ago there was not a “car problem” and now it has become unbearable. This problem can be addressed by replacing city commuting in cars with human/electric hybrids. Even in the USA we are adapting and essentially re-developing the way we look at our budgets and development strategies. On the other end of development, with new cities such as Masdar, Abu Dhabi, advanced vehicles such as the Imagine_PS™ may be a perfect sustainable method of transportation.
The promotional strategy is essentially the same for most markets – demonstrate to real people the very real benefits of this technology.
It’s our goal to provide an alternative in every single sector of human mobility. Almost every home on the planet could use an inexpensive and uninterruptible power system. A power system that also serves as a car is a major step forward. We are grateful to have this rare opportunity in civilization to create profound change, make healthy people and save the environment that we all share and cherish.
Thank you Society and Environment magazine for the excellent questions.
RE: 60 MPH?
Conversation with engineer and race car designer/builder Charles Samuel Greenwood P.E.
” A human powered car will go only as fast as its occupants make it go. However, with a small amount of additional power, it may be possible for many people to achieve truly useful cruising speeds. This has been the core of many years of research at HumanCar, Inc. The FM-4 was engineered to test the limits of four-person teams using a rowing like interface along with a push back power stroke. All of the major muscle groups can be utilized. Down hill testing of the FM-4 verified the vehicle stability of this design, traveling around corners at speeds in excess of 60 MPH. A tricycle configuration is inherently unstable under such conditions. That is why we do not “play cutesy” and offer three-wheeled electric contraptions that sneak through the licensing laws as “motorcycles”. Indeed, our down hill testing program has verified the absolute necessity of proper suspension, steering, chassis and brake design. We are lucky enough to have predicted a number of key changes in the specialty vehicle market. Low Mass Vehicles is a term originated by us in a 1996 white paper of the same title. One hundred years or more ago such an idea was well accepted, but larger and larger cars and trucks made it difficult for very elegant small vehicles to have market acceptance. Those days have changed. HumanCar, Inc. is now ready to produce a neighborhood electric vehicle that integrates the FM-4 biometric interface. The inevitable High Speed/Low Mass vehicles that will follow are already in the prototype lab. And yes, they go 60 MPH.”
“We’re hot rod builders, dirt bike riders, bicycling enthusiasts, and we love all kind of sports, with or without machines, with or without electronics. We love healthy people. You and your family will power yourselves down to the store and back.” -Charles S. Greenwood PE, HumanCar® Inventor
Specifications HC Imagine_PS™
* PHEV plug-in hybrid e-vehicle
* V2G Compatible
* Full body biometric input
* BodySteer™ Patented Chassis
* > 100 mpg equiv.
* SyncGuideway™ compatible
* Street legal low mass vehicle
* Mobile power station 110 A/C
HUMANCAR® INC. PRODUCT STREAM FOR 2011:
Imagine PS – PHEV NEV
The Imagine PS from HumanCar® is the world’s first bionic -human hybrid. It’s also a mobile power generator w/ 110v AC out.
A 1kW compact power gen.
* Compact suitcase sized
* 1 or 2 person
* 110v AC out
* 350kg supercar
* “Fun as hell”
* Full exotic interface/motors
FM4 TROUBLEMAKER “FULLY MANUAL FOUR PASSENGER & 300KPH RESEARCH ROD ON BACK UP.